Airdesign Hero X-ped size X-small 65-87 ( optimum 83 all up)
I have already test flown the Hero 2 in sizes 75-95. Here’s the Xalp version of the Hero, named X-ped, in a smaller size.
Like the Hero 2, the construction is excellent, with that nimble, very light cloth. Inflation is super easy, even in nil wind. The X-ped rises quickly, and the takeoff is eventful. In a sustained 30 km/k wind, the X-ped didn’t feel the need for extra control. Plain and very simple for the light D class category. The glider seems very taught and homogeneous. https://ad-gliders.com/project/hero-xped-yourbestmate/?lang=en
Let’s fly!
In the air, I flew the X-ped with the Airdesign Sock SL in size L, which weighs approximately 1.9 kg with an inflatable protector. I will also comment on that harness further down. AirDesign told me that the optimum weight for overall efficiency under that glider is around 83. And I precisely flew it at that exact weight. https://ad-gliders.com/project/the-sock-superlight-keepyoursockon/?lang=en
In the air, and after the first turn, I was already drunk on that dynamic, quick turn in thermals. What a beautiful extension to my arms on that small but very responsive glider. I felt exactly like a Swallow in the air! It’s a complete delight to find yourself playing with elements on such a machine.
The brakes are short, direct, and very responsive, allowing for tight turns to be made instantly.
The roll for the D category is quite acceptable. Because I am flying a larger version of the already tested Hero 2, I can say that the feel is the same, with a slightly more dynamic turn, but with a better-taught and more homogeneous structure. I asked myself, ‘Why is that, knowing it’s even lighter?’ It appears that the aspect ratio is lower, and perhaps with a good, solid internal structure, it felt even easier and more coherent than the Hero 2.
The Sock SL Large harness seems more stable than the Arrow P, I have over here in roll. For my personal body configuration, I felt that the Arrow P provided a bit more lumbar and back support. However, there’s a good, acceptable comfort under the Sock SL, which features a front rescue that I prefer more, and the colors are also joyful. The roll movements, as I mentioned, are less pronounced under the Sock SL, which provides a more stable harness than the Arrow-P in overall conditions. That being said, I never had any issues with weight shifting. I can say that I was very efficient under that nice combination, and I was also happy to reach that low weight.
The Sock SL pod is warm, considering its lightweight materials, and I could quickly slip into it.
I flew that glider with some friends next to other gliders to get an idea about climb and glide, and I will surely update my comparison later on.
The climb in weak air for the small size requires attention to avoid losing the weak core, but it is still acceptable for that small size. The climb is intense, the air is delightful, and the enjoyment of turning surpasses the efficiency of the climb, which is also suitable for the category.
At 83 all up, gliding headwind while pushing the speed bar, it is relatively easy to keep your futon, and the B steering is efficient to keep the glider on track. Perhaps the Zeolite 2 GT has a slight edge in rear riser control, but I had no issues on the X-ped with moderate pressure.
Ears with outer A’s are stable and efficient; they reopen without pilot intervention.
Conclusion:
A small, light, pleasurable to fly EN-D 2 liner from Airdesign. If you are a skilled pilot who prefers a very light, hike-and-fly aircraft with good overall performance and a treasure for handling, then this X-ped could end your search! It’s best to try it if it fits your needs. Around -7 kg overall +harness/outside bag/rescue/vario!
